Review the lease
Confirm current land-use, production stage, and existing closure commitments.
A mine closure plan is a statutory requirement from the day a lease is granted, not a document you write when operations wind down — and an outdated one can hold up a lease renewal on its own.
Closure plans are frequently the reason a lease renewal stalls — not because closure work is disputed, but because the existing plan is years out of date relative to actual operations. GSJ treats closure planning as a living document, not a one-time filing.
Confirm current land-use, production stage, and existing closure commitments.
Progressive and final reclamation measures mapped against the production schedule.
Financial provisions and monitoring commitments prepared per MCDR Rule 23.
Plan filed and carried through IBM review to approval.
It's a statutory requirement from the point a lease is granted — it isn't something to prepare only when operations are winding down.
Progressive closure covers reclamation measures carried out during active mining, area by area; final closure covers the complete site once mining ends.
Yes — a closure plan that doesn't reflect current mining method, production, or land-use can be flagged during renewal review, so it's worth checking before you file.
A financial assurance, typically a bank guarantee or similar instrument, sized to the cost of the reclamation and closure measures committed to in the plan.
Whether you're preparing a plan, renewing a lease, or resolving a clearance issue, tell us what is holding the project up. We'll help define the next practical step.
Schedule a meeting →